Make (Integromat)
Visual workflow automation platform
Make (Integromat) positions itself as a visual workflow automation platform that bridges the gap between simple task automation and complex enterprise integration solutions.
Market Position & Maturity
Market Standing
Make occupies a strategic mid-market position in the automation platform landscape, targeting organizations seeking more sophistication than basic automation tools while avoiding enterprise-level complexity and cost.
Company Maturity
Business maturity indicators include legacy pricing retention for former Integromat users during migration, providing cost protection for existing customers and demonstrating commitment to customer continuity [42].
Growth Trajectory
The platform's ability to process 10 million monthly AI tokens during its beta phase suggests substantial technical infrastructure and operational capacity [53][56].
Industry Recognition
Market validation comes through documented customer success stories like Dealerhive's implementation, which achieved 80% reduction in manual data entry and 50% faster response times [47].
Strategic Partnerships
Strategic partnerships include integrations with major ecommerce platforms like Shopify and business systems like Xero, indicating established relationships with key ecosystem players [57].
Longevity Assessment
Long-term viability appears supported by the platform's technical differentiation and established customer base, though success depends on effectively managing the complexity challenges that affect customer satisfaction in advanced implementations [43][59].
Proof of Capabilities
Customer Evidence
Dealerhive's automotive lead generation implementation provides the most comprehensive proof of Make's capabilities, demonstrating 80% reduction in manual data entry and 50% faster response times through CRM-database synchronization workflows [47].
Quantified Outcomes
Dealerhive's implementation demonstrates clear operational improvements with 80% reduction in manual data entry and 50% faster response times [47].
Case Study Analysis
Dealerhive's case study validates Make's ability to deliver measurable operational improvements in business-critical processes.
Market Validation
Customer retention patterns indicate strong performance for straightforward automation scenarios, with high retention rates in simple automations like Reddit comment monitoring [44].
Competitive Wins
Make's superior workflow granularity compared to competitors, with advanced features like loops, routers, and error handlers, provides greater control over complex automation sequences [45].
Reference Customers
CloudCache Consulting references Make's seamless integration capabilities in connecting complex business systems [57].
AI Technology
Make's technical foundation centers on visual workflow automation with sophisticated conditional logic capabilities that distinguish it from simpler automation platforms. The platform's 9 pre-built AI modules include sentiment analysis, text categorization, and language translation, processing 10 million monthly tokens at no extra cost during its beta phase [53][56].
Architecture
Architecture advantages include superior workflow granularity compared to competitors, with advanced features like loops, routers, and error handlers providing greater control over complex automation sequences [45].
Primary Competitors
Zapier, where Make supports fewer integrations (1,000+ vs. 4,000+) but provides superior workflow granularity with advanced features like loops, routers, and error handlers [45].
Competitive Advantages
Operations-based pricing that can offer cost benefits for predictable workflows, 9 pre-built AI modules processing 10 million monthly tokens at no extra cost [53][56], and agentic automation capabilities enabling dynamic workflow adaptation through AI decision-making [54].
Market Positioning
Targets the mid-market segment between simple automation tools and enterprise-level complexity. Organizations seeking more sophistication than basic task automation but avoiding enterprise costs may find Make's positioning attractive [42][59].
Win/Loss Scenarios
Win scenarios favor Make when organizations require advanced conditional logic, AI integration capabilities, and cost-effective pricing for moderate-volume workflows. Loss scenarios occur when extensive integration catalogs are required, simple task-based automation needs make traditional SaaS pricing more cost-effective, or when organizations lack technical resources to manage operations-based pricing complexity [45][59].
Key Features
Pros & Cons
Use Cases
Integrations
Pricing
Featured In Articles
How We Researched This Guide
About This Guide: This comprehensive analysis is based on extensive competitive intelligence and real-world implementation data from leading AI vendors. StayModern updates this guide quarterly to reflect market developments and vendor performance changes.
59+ verified sources per analysis including official documentation, customer reviews, analyst reports, and industry publications.
- • Vendor documentation & whitepapers
- • Customer testimonials & case studies
- • Third-party analyst assessments
- • Industry benchmarking reports
Standardized assessment framework across 8 key dimensions for objective comparison.
- • Technology capabilities & architecture
- • Market position & customer evidence
- • Implementation experience & support
- • Pricing value & competitive position
Research is refreshed every 90 days to capture market changes and new vendor capabilities.
- • New product releases & features
- • Market positioning changes
- • Customer feedback integration
- • Competitive landscape shifts
Every claim is source-linked with direct citations to original materials for verification.
- • Clickable citation links
- • Original source attribution
- • Date stamps for currency
- • Quality score validation
Analysis follows systematic research protocols with consistent evaluation frameworks.
- • Standardized assessment criteria
- • Multi-source verification process
- • Consistent evaluation methodology
- • Quality assurance protocols
Buyer-focused analysis with transparent methodology and factual accuracy commitment.
- • Objective comparative analysis
- • Transparent research methodology
- • Factual accuracy commitment
- • Continuous quality improvement
Quality Commitment: If you find any inaccuracies in our analysis of Make (Integromat), please contact us at research@staymodern.ai. We're committed to maintaining the highest standards of research integrity and will investigate and correct any issues promptly.